Viewing Issue Advanced Details
ID Category [?] Severity [?] Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
04316 Compiling Major Always Apr 22, 2011, 16:57 Apr 23, 2011, 21:21
Tester jordi View Status Public Platform SDLMAME
Assigned To Resolution Fixed OS Linux
Status [?] Resolved Driver
Version 0.141 Fixed in Version 0.142 Build PowerPC
Fixed in Git Commit Github Pull Request #
Summary 04316: MAME/SDL/Linux/PowerPC does not build
Description 0.141 does not build for ppclinux, due to a wrongly declared ifdef construct.

Compiling src/mame/drivers/aleck64.c...
cc1plus: warnings being treated as errors
In file included from src/mame/includes/n64.h:5:0,
                 from src/mame/drivers/aleck64.c:173:
src/mame/video/n64.h:43:5: error: "LSB_FIRST" is not defined
make[2]: *** [obj/sdl/mame/mame/drivers/aleck64.o] Error 1

The attached patch, now available in the Debian package, fixes it.
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information
Github Commit
Flags
Regression Version
Affected Sets / Systems
Attached Files
txt file icon fix_ppc_build.txt (611 bytes) Apr 22, 2011, 16:57 Uploaded by jordi
Fix sdlmame linuxppc build
[Show Content]
Relationships
There are no relationship linked to this issue.
Notes
6
User avatar
No.07391
Fujix
Administrator
Apr 22, 2011, 17:27
I allowed a file with the .patch extension.

BTW, please DO NOT use Mantis for reporting your request. Please remember THIS IS ONLY FOR MAME.
You can use a report note if you want to ask me to allow a .patch file.

In addition, your report is for 0.141. Please reconfirm that you have the same issue with the latest version of MAME.
User avatar
No.07392
Tafoid
Administrator
Apr 22, 2011, 17:32
Also, since this appears to be an SDL specific issue, you would be better served by posting at the SDLMAME forum if the problem persists with 0.142 (current working base is 0.142u1):
http://forums.bannister.org/ubbthreads.php?ubb=postlist&Board=8
User avatar
No.07394
R. Belmont
Developer
Apr 22, 2011, 23:11
As far as I can tell, this has already been fixed in 0.142.

I don't quite get Fuji's objection since this bug *is* for MAME :)
User avatar
No.07396
jordi
Tester
Apr 23, 2011, 00:50
Hi!

Sorry Fujix, as you know I'm very new to the MAME community and still need to learn my ways. :) I had no idea where to report the patch thing, I still did not know who the administrators are or how to reach them.

Sorry for the noise!

R. Belmont, thanks for the info. In Debian we still have 0.141 because we had been working on some other issues before updating to the new version. FYI, mame hit debian unstable today and will appear soonish in Ubuntu distributions.
User avatar
No.07397
Fujix
Administrator
Apr 23, 2011, 02:45
edited on: Apr 23, 2011, 05:44
RB, in fact jordi made an another single bug report that Mantis doesn't allow adding a file with .patch extension. I already deleted it.

jordi, I understand your situation. Our Guide Line page and FAQ page will help making a better report.

http://mametesters.org/rules.html
http://mametesters.org/faq.html

Enjoy testing.
User avatar
No.07398
R. Belmont
Developer
Apr 23, 2011, 21:21
Jordi: glad to hear MAME is hitting unstable!

Many distro and OS guys contact me directly rather than through MAMETesters - the bannister.org forum is a good place (you'll see posts from Belegdol, who makes the RPMs for Fedora/Red Hat/CentOS) or you can PM me to get an email.

Now, I have a NetBSD patch to apply :)