 No.04400
Tafoid Administrator
May 18, 2009, 21:08
|
It would appear there is a major issue based on comparisons between 0.130u1 and 0.130u2. The only obvious thing I can see related to this is:nemesis.c fix [Hau] Done incorrectly? |
|---|---|
 No.04401
Mamesick Senior Tester
May 19, 2009, 14:26
|
In 0.130u2 the video emulation for this game was partially rewritten. It's the cause of the performance decrease. Reverting back the code (which is quite tedious and complicated and breaks Magical Error, it seems) fixes the issue. |
 No.04402
etabeta Developer
May 19, 2009, 15:49
|
which means we should close the report, doesn't it? |
|
No.04404
Mamesick Senior Tester
May 20, 2009, 05:49
|
Looks like performing rasters on sprites too is the cause of the slow video emulation. With a kludge you can avoid this and get full speed. Though it should be verified against real hardware. This reminds me a similar issue with FUUKIFG2.C and FUUKIFG3.C drivers, which is already reported here. |
|
No.12969
Osso Moderator
Jul 25, 2016, 11:17
|
This got a speed boost in 0.157 and runs now at almost the same speed as in 0.130. Closing. |