Viewing Issue Advanced Details
ID Category [?] Severity [?] Reproducibility Date Submitted Last Update
00003 Misc. Trivial N/A Jan 14, 2008, 01:46 Sep 8, 2018, 07:26
Tester AWJ View Status Public Platform
Assigned To Resolution Open OS
Status [?] Confirmed Driver segas16b.cpp
Version 0.103u2 Fixed in Version Build
Summary 00003: goldnaxe2, goldnaxe3, goldnaxej, passsht: ROM board have two of their four CPU ROMs in common.
Description ROM board (goldnax2, goldnax3 and goldnaxj) have two of their four CPU ROMs in common: epr12521.a8 and epr12519.a6. However, I believe that these ROMs are incorrect for goldnax3 and goldnaxj, since both these sets fail their ROM test in service mode (see screenshot). goldnax2 does pass the ROM test.
Steps To Reproduce
Additional Information Updated by AWJ: I've asked CGFM about this and he says the ROMs pass the test on the PCB. So the failed test in MAME is caused by an emulation problem, not mismatched ROMs.

From Haze: passing shot sets also fail their rom check fwiw.
Flags
Regression Version
Affected Sets / Systems goldnaxe2, goldnaxe3, goldnaxej, passsht
Attached Files
png file icon goldnaxe3_goldnaxej.png (1,253 bytes) Apr 24, 2010, 15:28
png file icon passsht.png (2,137 bytes) Apr 24, 2010, 15:29
png file icon goldnaxe2.png (1,185 bytes) Apr 24, 2010, 15:31
Relationships
There are no relationship linked to this issue.
Notes
3
User avatar
No.06002
Tafoid
Administrator
Apr 24, 2010, 15:31
Added screens. I noticed that of the 3 mentioned golden axe sets - goldnaxe2 is the only one that shows the "Scratch Ram" as bad.
User avatar
No.06003
AWJ
Developer
Apr 24, 2010, 16:06
The scratch RAM failure is because of the MCU being simulated. goldnaxe (the parent set, the only other goldnaxe set protected by an MCU instead of encryption) also shows the scratch RAM being bad.
User avatar
No.15426
Robbbert
Developer
Sep 8, 2018, 07:26
goldnaxe, goldnaxe2 Scratch Ram test now passes (0.201)